Skip to main content

  In their introduction to Digital History, Cohen and Rosenzweig present the changes in how history is both produced and consumed in the wake of the digital revolution. They see both positive and negative consequences to this dramatic shift in access, as more people have more access to the historical record and the scholarship that interprets that data. They raise many questions, both ethical and practical, and their book offers historians a guide to navigating the new technology that will help them capitalize on the benefits while avoiding its liabilities. In “It’s a Wonderful Block,” Mark Oppenheimer offers readers a chance to zoom in to a particular place, a single block of West Rock Avenue, New Haven. Seeing the neighborhood through his eyes, he gives an interesting, detailed account of his block as an organism, and what he thinks are the dynamics that make it a great place to live. He places these dynamics within the context of trends in urban planning.  

 At first glance these two readings would seem to have little in common. Upon reflection, perhaps the microhistory of what makes a city block ‘work’ for its residents can be seen as a type of material that can now be accessed by many due to the digital revolution. While it was published in a magazine, it has been accessed here digitally. Its author is not a historian in the traditional sense, but his narrative could be accessed digitally by historians in the future trying to tell the story of urban planning or New Haven history. While Digital History is from 2005, and the technologies have evolved, the ethical questions they ask continue to be relevant.  One especially important change is the nature of how all this data is stored. Will the cloud remain a reliable storehouse? Will the democratic nature of the internet survive? And who will control the data it contains, the producers of content or the storage entities? Will the blogs we create for our careers be available to posterity? And what role,if any, will AI play? For me personally, these are interesting questions as I learn to ‘do’ history, as the definition of who and what a historian is continues to evolve. 

Comments

  1. Jason W. SmithJune 2, 2024 at 9:55 AM

    Good, Brian. I like your framing of Oppenheimer's approach as block as organism. I think I agree, but I'm wondering what you mean exactly. Can you elaborate?

    These are all good questions, and one's very much still up for debate and decision, although certainly trends have moved us in a number of directions. As far as connections between the pieces, I might add a kind of commonality that decentralizes as common to be readings. As much as urban designers can "plan" a particular engagement with neighborhoods and a construction of community, Oppenheimer would argue that it's people who can direct a narrative, establish a neighborhood ethos, etc. In a similar way, we see the internet's promise in hypertextuality as a way of decentralizing certain hierarchies. For Oppenheimer, the absence of hierarchies, I think, is something that makes West Rock Avenue "work."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Brian SmithJune 3, 2024 at 7:36 AM

      Oppenheimer described a great block as a delicate ecology, in a perpetual state of flux; which made me think of it as an organism, rather than a static place with a certain built environment and a fixed demographic profile. Much like an organism it is a living thing, constantly evolving as residents age and new neighbors move in.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

  The chapters from Model City B lues highlight the tensi on between a business management style of urban renewal and one that allows for citizen involvement , as it specifically relates to redevelopment in New Haven in the 1960’s. Jackson details how racial attitudes influenced the assumption that primarily white academic and business leaders knew what was best for neighborhoods such as the Hill . She explains that neighborhood organizers had a long and sometimes successful history of advocating with Mayor Lee’s administration for improvements and taking direct action to improve their neighborhood, while the focus of the planners worked to stymie c itizen involvement. Jackson describes how New Haven fit into the broader issue of urban redevelopment as a national issue, and h ow Mayor Lee’s relationship with the Federal Government fostered a top-down formula for deciding how Federal dollars were spent in the city.   It was with great interest that I read Jackson’s histor...
1 comment
Read more
Post a Comment
Read more
  The chapters from Mendez’s book relates the story of Black soldiers in the Union Army during the American Civil War. He details the recruitment process, the experience of the troops in battle, the circumstances of their families on the home front , and for those t hat survived the war, their re union with loved ones. The Emancipation Proclamation authorized the forming of Black regiments and provided an opportunity for Black men to fight for the country they lived in , prove their worth as citizens, and risk their lives  to end slavery. He acknowledges the doubts, born of racial prejudice , held by whites concerning w hether Blacks would perform well as soldiers. Those doubts were soon overcome by their courageous actions at Po rt Hudson, Milliken's Bend, and the assault on Fort Wagner. In addition to the mortal danger faced by the troops, there w ere the sacrifices their families made, often being without a means of support, and lacking the benefits that socie...
1 comment
Read more