Skip to main content

  In their introduction to Digital History, Cohen and Rosenzweig present the changes in how history is both produced and consumed in the wake of the digital revolution. They see both positive and negative consequences to this dramatic shift in access, as more people have more access to the historical record and the scholarship that interprets that data. They raise many questions, both ethical and practical, and their book offers historians a guide to navigating the new technology that will help them capitalize on the benefits while avoiding its liabilities. In “It’s a Wonderful Block,” Mark Oppenheimer offers readers a chance to zoom in to a particular place, a single block of West Rock Avenue, New Haven. Seeing the neighborhood through his eyes, he gives an interesting, detailed account of his block as an organism, and what he thinks are the dynamics that make it a great place to live. He places these dynamics within the context of trends in urban planning.  

 At first glance these two readings would seem to have little in common. Upon reflection, perhaps the microhistory of what makes a city block ‘work’ for its residents can be seen as a type of material that can now be accessed by many due to the digital revolution. While it was published in a magazine, it has been accessed here digitally. Its author is not a historian in the traditional sense, but his narrative could be accessed digitally by historians in the future trying to tell the story of urban planning or New Haven history. While Digital History is from 2005, and the technologies have evolved, the ethical questions they ask continue to be relevant.  One especially important change is the nature of how all this data is stored. Will the cloud remain a reliable storehouse? Will the democratic nature of the internet survive? And who will control the data it contains, the producers of content or the storage entities? Will the blogs we create for our careers be available to posterity? And what role,if any, will AI play? For me personally, these are interesting questions as I learn to ‘do’ history, as the definition of who and what a historian is continues to evolve. 

Comments

  1. Jason W. SmithJune 2, 2024 at 9:55 AM

    Good, Brian. I like your framing of Oppenheimer's approach as block as organism. I think I agree, but I'm wondering what you mean exactly. Can you elaborate?

    These are all good questions, and one's very much still up for debate and decision, although certainly trends have moved us in a number of directions. As far as connections between the pieces, I might add a kind of commonality that decentralizes as common to be readings. As much as urban designers can "plan" a particular engagement with neighborhoods and a construction of community, Oppenheimer would argue that it's people who can direct a narrative, establish a neighborhood ethos, etc. In a similar way, we see the internet's promise in hypertextuality as a way of decentralizing certain hierarchies. For Oppenheimer, the absence of hierarchies, I think, is something that makes West Rock Avenue "work."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Brian SmithJune 3, 2024 at 7:36 AM

      Oppenheimer described a great block as a delicate ecology, in a perpetual state of flux; which made me think of it as an organism, rather than a static place with a certain built environment and a fixed demographic profile. Much like an organism it is a living thing, constantly evolving as residents age and new neighbors move in.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

  Ed V u l liamy’s article on poverty and income inequality in the United States focuses on New Haven, Connecticut , as an example of the stark differences in wealth that exist there . He   employs the narratives of homeless individuals, whose daily struggle for survival takes place in close proximity to Yale University, one of the most prestigious and wealthy institutions of higher learning in the country. Also presented are the voices of the working poor, whose labor keeps the machinery of Yale going, yet they struggle to break free of the culture of poverty . He describes the incongruity of such poverty existing in the shadow of enormous wealth and offers New Haven as being emblematic of America’s income inequality. While the problems of homelessness and poverty have not gone away in the decades since the 2002 article, Mayor Justin Elicke r’s 2024 State of the City address is hopeful that programs that the city has initiated can address some the issues and improve the
2 comments
Read more
  New Haven Harbor looking from Sandy Point West haven
Post a Comment
Read more
  “ Yankee Elysium ” chronicles the rise and fall of the Elm Tree in New England and New Haven in particular . Campanella sees the planting of shade trees, and Elms in particular, in villages and cities of New England as an intentional design intended to ameliorate the negative effects of urban growth. Incorporating the pastoral into its growing villages and cities was in keeping with the Jeffersonian vision of America as a nation of ‘ y eoman f armers ,’ and worked as a hedge against the sins inherent in large cities as seen in the Old World. At its pinnacle in the latter half of the 19 th century, the st ately rows of Elms provided a n antidote to the rush of progress in cities across the country. New Haven, dubbed the “Elm City,’ w as singled out in praise by leading writers and prominent leaders. These same voices anguished over the devas tation of the Elms that progress, abetted by the Dutch Elm Disease and the 1938 Hurricane , brought to New Haven , New England, and t
1 comment
Read more