Skip to main content

  In “Podcasting the Past, Benjamin Breen explores the role of podcasting in the field of history. He evaluates the benefits and the shortcomings of this recent phenomenon in making history available to a wider audience and comes away with the opinion that historians should embrace this new medium. In answer to the primary criticism coming from academic historians that this content is often produced by amateurs and not by ‘scholars,’ Breen notes that neither Herodotus nor Edward Gibbon held advanced degrees in history. He cites the enormous popularity of history podcasts as evidence of the appetite and enthusiasm for history that exists beyond the world of academia. He sees podcasts as a way to get people interested in history at a time when the formal study of history is waning. “The Delicious History of Pizza in New Haven,” is an example of a podcast that is a conversation that takes place over pizza at Modern Apizza in New Haven. This format is interesting in that it provides listeners with details about this culinary tradition in an informal, folksy way.  

While I found the pizza podcast enjoyable and informative, I was also aware of Breen’s criticism that the medium lacks the ability to see source notes. At one point Caplan makes a definitive statement about early pizzerias in New Haven without citing any source that made me question its veracity. At the same time, I realize that the format simply does not allow that and if it did it would undermine its broader appeal. Breen does mention that some academic historians are beginning to embrace podcasts, (and other new mediums) but the popularity of the ones he cited are often produced by amateurs or professionals whose degrees are not in History. As a Public Radio listener, I have been entertained, and sometimes educated by This American Life and The Moth.” These shows focus on the narrative, which as Breen and many before him have pointed out is what history amounts to. One of my daughters turned me on to a podcast called “Stuff You Should Know,” which I find very enjoyable. They often involve history, and I find them enjoyable and informative, often satisfying a curiosity that I think is at the heart of most popular interest in history.  I would say it is not a question of either or, with respect to podcasts versus scholarly monographs, there is plenty of room for both in the field of History.

Comments

  1. Good, Brian. What does Breen suggest about the opportunities of doing podcasting as historical practice that more traditional modes of teaching, learning, and doing history cannot as easily incorporate? Does the apizza podcast's informality in any way dilute the sophistication of the history being presented? On your point about podcasts and scholarship not being an either/or proposition--Caplan also has a book on New Haven apizza, so any listener whose appetite is whetted by the podcast, or who is looking for more documentation, can go to the book. The two can indeed be complimentary.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

  In their introduction to Digital History , Cohen and Rosenzweig present the changes in  how history is both produced and consumed in the wake of the digital revolution. They see both positive and negative consequences to this dramatic shift in access , as more people have more access to the historical record and the scholarship that interprets that data. They raise many questions , both ethical and practical, and their book offers historians a guide to navigating the new technology that will help them capitalize on the b enefits while avoiding its liabilities. In “It’s a Wonderful Block,” Mark Oppenheimer offers readers a chance to zoom in to a particular place, a single block of West Rock Avenue, New Haven. Seeing the neighborhood through his eyes, he gi ves an interesting, detailed account of his block as an organism, and what he thinks are the dynamics that make it a great place to live. He places these dynamics within the context of trends in urban planning. ...
  “ Yankee Elysium ” chronicles the rise and fall of the Elm Tree in New England and New Haven in particular . Campanella sees the planting of shade trees, and Elms in particular, in villages and cities of New England as an intentional design intended to ameliorate the negative effects of urban growth. Incorporating the pastoral into its growing villages and cities was in keeping with the Jeffersonian vision of America as a nation of ‘ y eoman f armers ,’ and worked as a hedge against the sins inherent in large cities as seen in the Old World. At its pinnacle in the latter half of the 19 th century, the st ately rows of Elms provided a n antidote to the rush of progress in cities across the country. New Haven, dubbed the “Elm City,’ w as singled out in praise by leading writers and prominent leaders. These same voices anguished over the devas tation of the Elms that progress, abetted by the Dutch Elm Disease and the 1938 Hurricane , brought to New Haven , New England, a...
  Dayton’s chapter on the legal system in colonial New Haven chronicles the evolution of its structure, with a particular focus on gender and social standing. The Puritan ethos of its leaders, Theophilus Eaton and John Davenport, led them to establish a colony without a charter from the crown, envisioning a society that would answer to a higher , scriptural authority. The importance the Puritan religion placed on identifying and punishing sin , combined with English Common Law tradition, created a dynamic legal system that had consequences for women's legal standing. This puritan ical obsession with allowing no sin to go unpunished had the unintended effect of liberating women in the P uritan’s scripturally based divorce laws. Dayton presents an economic and social history of New Haven that helps explain the unique circumstances that influenced the evolution of legal proceedings in the colony , and the influence that a growing comme rc ial and industrial sector contributed to...